This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: variable objects and registers

From: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs dot msu dot su>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:00:55 +1300
Subject: Re: variable objects and registers
References: <17782.41205.881283.845357@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17801.58248.297377.752117@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061230202601.GA25539@nevyn.them.org> <200612302340.22697.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20061230205032.GE25539@nevyn.them.org>

 > Yes, BLOCK_START and BLOCK_END are currently the right way to check
 > if an address is in a block.

Yes, I think this is how it would. Let's come up with an implementation first
and then you can try shoot it down.


-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob

References:
- Re: variable objects and registers
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: variable objects and registers
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: variable objects and registers
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: variable objects and registers
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: variable objects and registers
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]