This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/doc] Re: RFC: A change to the way we initialize new gdbarches
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:33:03 +0200
- Subject: Re: [rfa/doc] Re: RFC: A change to the way we initialize new gdbarches
- References: <20061004231025.GA9687@nevyn.them.org> <200610052006.k95K69UK024656@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20061005202536.GA10876@nevyn.them.org> <20061018204802.GA20757@nevyn.them.org> <20061109195012.GB14732@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:50:12 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
> Index: src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> --- src.orig/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 2006-11-09 14:14:55.000000000 -0500
> +++ src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 2006-11-09 14:33:05.000000000 -0500
Thanks. This patch is fine with me, except for the following minor
comment:
> +The initialization function has this type:
> +
> +@smallexample
> +static struct gdbarch *
> +@var{arch}_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info,
> + struct gdbarch_list *arches)
> +@end smallexample
> +
> +The @var{info} argument contains parameters used to select the correct
> +architecture, and @var{arches} is a list of architectures which
I think both `info' and `arches' should have a @var markup in the
@smallexample as well, to make them consistent with the following text
that describes them.