This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Don't give spurious warnings when using thread specific breakpoints
> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
> Cc: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:20:40 +0200
> >
> > ALL_BREAKPOINTS (b)
> > if (b->loc->address == pc) /* address match / overlay match */
> > if (!b->pending && (!overlay_debugging || b->loc->section == section))
> > {
> > others--;
> > if (others == 1 &&
> > (b->enable_state == bp_disabled ||
> > b->enable_state == bp_shlib_disabled ||
> > b->enable_state == bp_call_disabled))
> > printf_filtered (_("Note: breakpoint %d (disabled) also set at pc "),
>
> That won't work either. Some languages (notably German) need to put the
> verb at the end of the sentence in such a case.
Yes, for better results the following call to
deprecated_print_address_numeric should be made a part of the message
(as a format specifier, for example, or concatenated string).