This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix spurious mi-basics.exp failures


Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:02:37PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> > I can't think of exactly how the anchoring would have just anything
> > related to these tests.  I'm just wondering, what fixed the 
> > relative/absolute path problem?
> 
> My point is that before the anchoring, the "^done" pattern probably
> matched "203^done" in the output.
> 
> They're still broken if you configure with a relative path, which you
> can see from your output:

That sounds like a reasonable explanation.  I've always had to configure
with an absolute path, or else these tests would fail.  However, since
some time the tests fail even when configuring with an absolute path.
The patch I'm proposing gets them back to passing in that case (with
relative path they still fail).

Is the patch OK then?

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  Linux on zSeries Development
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]