This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: Add 'target |' support for MinGW
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:38:55 -0700
- Subject: Re: RFA: Add 'target |' support for MinGW
- References: <vt21ww39svn.fsf@theseus.home.> <uhd4z44do.fsf@gnu.org>
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
>> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:04:44 -0700
>>
>> src/gdb/ChangeLog:
>> 2006-04-11 Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
>>
>> Add support for 'target remote |' on MinGW.
>> * ser-mingw.c (struct pipe_state): New structure.
>> (make_pipe_state, free_pipe_state, cleanup_pipe_state)
>> (pipe_windows_open, pipe_windows_close, pipe_windows_read)
>> (pipe_windows_write, pipe_wait_handle): New functions.
>> (_initialize_ser_windows): Register a "pipe" interface based on
>> them.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> + const char *err_msg
>> + = pex_run (ps->pex, PEX_SEARCH | PEX_BINARY_INPUT | PEX_BINARY_OUTPUT,
>> + argv[0], argv, NULL, NULL,
>> + &err);
>> [...]
>> + DWORD bytes_read;
>> + if (! ReadFile (pipeline_out, scb->buf, count, &bytes_read, NULL))
>> + return -1;
>> [...]
>> + DWORD written;
>> + if (! WriteFile (pipeline_in, buf, count, &written, NULL))
>> + return -1;
>
> Do we really want binary I/O in _all_ situations? Can it be that,
> depending on the command on the other side of the pipe, someone would
> like the CR characters to be stripped from the EOLs in the incoming
> stuff? The way you wrote it, AFAICS, binary I/O is always used, no
> matter what.
Well, the pipe is carrying the GDB remote protocol, which is happier
with binary.