This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc at cn dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:13:05 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602240250300.7628@localhost.localdomain>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 02:54:16 -0500 (EST)
> From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
>
> Here is the modified document patch for F90 derived type support. Please
> review and comment.
Reviewed; comments below.
> + Fortran 90 and later support derived type (a.k.a structure). For a
^^^^^
This should be "a.k.a.@:". You forgot the last period, and @: tells
TeX that this period does not end a sentence, so that TeX typeset it
correctly.
> + type = Type bar
> + int4 :: c
> + real*4 :: d
> + End Type bar
Btw, isn't it more consistent to print "integer*4" instead of "int4"?
Either that, or just "integer", I think. Or is "int4" a valid type
name in f90? (The last Fortran I used was f77, so please forgive my
ignorance.)
> + For example, for variable q of type foo defined above:
"q" and "foo" should be in @code (they are program symbols).
> + Please be noted that in the above example, the result of @code{print q}
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Please note".
Other than that, fine with me. Thanks.