This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Target stderr not displayed thru MI

From: Denis PILAT <denis dot pilat at st dot com>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:43:20 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Target stderr not displayed thru MI
References: <17293.36697.854192.691800@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <438DA1DE.2020406@st.com> <17294.2894.345752.773239@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <438F011F.7050403@st.com> <20051201140436.GA31759@white> <20051201143218.GB13069@nevyn.them.org> <17295.22919.290876.649298@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>

Nick Roberts wrote:

DP> I'm not sticked to have one more MI stream today since nobody
DP> will use it efficiently, I just need to have at least target error
DP> reported to a stream, even if it's the only mi stream available (mi->targ).

Since no-one else appears to need another MI stream, or possibly even use MI
for remote debugging, if we accept that adding a stream later may present
compatibility problems, his original patch seems appropriate.

Nick,

Can I consider that my original patch (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-11/msg00497.html) is accepted ?

Denis

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Target stderr not displayed thru MI
  - From: Nick Roberts

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Target stderr not displayed thru MI
  - From: Denis PILAT
- Re: [PATCH] Target stderr not displayed thru MI
  - From: Bob Rossi
- Re: [PATCH] Target stderr not displayed thru MI
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [PATCH] Target stderr not displayed thru MI
  - From: Nick Roberts

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]