This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ppc32 debugging ppc64, part 1

From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, gdb-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:38:57 -0700
Subject: Re: ppc32 debugging ppc64, part 1
References: <20050912125047.GA5411@twiddle.net> <200509121947.j8CJlT1H030779@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:47:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> This code really should be using PTRACE_GETREGS and friends (like you
> indicate in the patch) but those are not implemented I assume?

It's implemented in the kernel, but since it only covers the general
and floating-point registers, it wouldn't have helped my problem.
We would still need to go through this code path for the instruction
pointer, so there was no point not fixing this first.

r~

References:
- ppc32 debugging ppc64, part 1
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ppc32 debugging ppc64, part 1
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]