This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi + doco] -var-update
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>, Bob Rossi <bob at brasko dot net>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 07:55:13 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi + doco] -var-update
- References: <16929.8147.933720.246602@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <16955.41017.161288.832646@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050401024942.GA2179@white> <17013.35649.62745.226730@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050502040526.GA10023@nevyn.them.org> <17013.54662.20554.239976@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050617034329.GH17013@nevyn.them.org> <uoea51bqt.fsf@gnu.org> <20050617140410.GA24575@nevyn.them.org> <ud5qk0z51.fsf@gnu.org> <20050703195630.GM13811@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 15:56:30 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>,
> gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> Personally, I think --no-values and --all-values are a reasonable pair.
> But in any case, we all seem agreed that --no-values, --simple-values,
> and --all-values are a reasonable triplet.
>
> Nick, here's a patch based on yours which adds -var-list-children
> --simple-values and -var-update --simple-values/--all-values. I like
> it; I think --simple-values is useful (since for anything other than
> simple values, an IDE is likely to want to print each member
> individually...).
>
> I didn't revise the documentation because your last posted patch didn't
> include the current manual diff. I also didn't write any testcases.
> Both of these need to be done before the patch goes in. Tested on
> i686-pc-linux-gnu, both the testsuite and by hand for -var-update.
>
> No incompatible changes, option consistency, and behavior consistency.
> I don't think I can do any better than this :-) Nick, Eli, are you
> both OK with this version of the code changes?
It's okay with me, but I hope we won't forget the doco changes to go
with these.
Thanks.