This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: cp-names.c vs cp-namespace.c

From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 02:18:59 +0300
Subject: Re: cp-names.c vs cp-namespace.c
References: <01c55664$Blat.v2.4$45620fe0@zahav.net.il> <20050511200716.GA4104@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:07:17 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Couldn't you use a separate object directory on DOS, as IIRC we
> recommend everyone do?

That won't help in this case, since cp-names.o and cp-namespace.o will
also clash.  Or did I misunderstood what you mean?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cp-names.c vs cp-namespace.c
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- cp-names.c vs cp-namespace.c
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: cp-names.c vs cp-namespace.c
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]