This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] Unconditionally include shared library code
On Sun, 8 May 2005 18:01:41 -0400
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:46:08PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 10:56:27 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> >
> > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:51:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Hmm, that'd work. We'll have to face the inconsistent interface issue
> > > eventually, but it's a seperate issue indeed. Any objection if I
> > > introduce a config/tm-solib.h and use that? Its purpose is a bit more
> > > clear, and the risk of abuse is smaller. The mechanical update is not
> > > without risk, but I'm willing to take it. Deal?
> >
> > I like it. It is indeed a tm file and shouldn't be used any other way.
> >
> > I reworked the patch to avoid shlib.[ch]. Looking at the changes I
> > think the risk of changing solib.h into tm-solib.h under config/ is
> > riskier than leaving config/ alone and simply removing the #defines
> > from solib.h. I'm moving towards checking in the attached patch at
> > the end of the coming week.
>
> I like this even more! Kevin?
It's okay with me.
Kevin