This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix in-srcdir build of gcc

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:40:24 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix in-srcdir build of gcc
References: <421F4992.3030000@lu.unisi.ch> <200502251943.j1PJhnxo031954@greed.delorie.com> <42203256.6040108@lu.unisi.ch>

I am too. Unfortunately this patch on one hand makes ./configure work for gcc, on the other hand it makes it more "surprising" for binutils/gdb. I am especially concerned about gdb, because of the two it is the one that is most likely to be built by casual users doing "./configure && make".

The symbolic link confuses the fixincludes makefile.

What about making the patch create an host-subdir only when gcc is present?

Paolo

References:
- [PATCH] Fix in-srcdir build of gcc
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] Fix in-srcdir build of gcc
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [PATCH] Fix in-srcdir build of gcc
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]