This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] new frame code for h8300 target
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:03:07AM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> At Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:02:48 -0500,
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> > [1 <text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (7bit)>]
> > Just FYI, the changes to resurect h8300-tdep.c and h8300.mt are ok (I
> > see the're already committed). However the change to resurect
> > config/h8300/tm-h8300.h isn't - the h8300 is now considered to be a new
> > architecture and any new architecture is required to be pure multi-arch
> > (i.e., no tm-*.h file).
> >
> > Looking forward to patches that fix that.
> >
> > In the mean time I've committed the attached,
> > Andrew
>
> I made sure.
> Because a section depending on tm-h8300.h seems to be left,
> I will correct it.
I guess you mean this patch:
2005-02-16 Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
* remote-e7000.c: unuse TM_FILE defined macro.
(e7000_fetch_registers)
(e7000_store_registers)
(e7000_wait): delete NUM_REALREGS.
* remote-hms.c: move TM_FILE macro.
(CCR_REGNO): move define from tm-h8300.h.
I didn't see this patch posted to gdb-patches; please always post
patches to the mailing list before committing them.
Who should be listed as the maintainer for the h8300 port? It is still
listed as deleted in MAINTAINERS.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC