This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED

From: Randolph Chung <randolph at tausq dot org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:25:30 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
References: <20041123174937.GL9148@tausq.org> <41AA09F8.4020006@gnu.org> <20041128184141.GG6359@tausq.org> <41AA2D08.3030304@gnu.org> <20041129033013.GJ6359@tausq.org> <41AB3C1D.80509@gnu.org> <20041201061924.GZ6359@tausq.org> <20041201171137.GA8037@nevyn.them.org> <20041201171712.GE6359@tausq.org> <20041201171910.GA8771@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: Randolph Chung <randolph at tausq dot org>

> > this is exactly what the instruction_nullified method that i added do :)
> 
> Could you do this at the end of the to_wait hook, if I provided a way
> for the native target to override to_wait?  Oh, I guess it's an
> architecture property, not a target property, so you'd need to do it
> for remote stubs too.

probably yes; but why is this better?

randolph
-- 
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
  - From: Randolph Chung
- Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
  - From: Randolph Chung
- Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]