This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[patch/rfa] Don't assume SIG32 in staticthreads.exp
- From: Randolph Chung <randolph at tausq dot org>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:46:37 -0800
- Subject: [patch/rfa] Don't assume SIG32 in staticthreads.exp
- Reply-to: Randolph Chung <randolph at tausq dot org>
SIGRTMIN is 37 on hppa-linux and hpux, instead of 32, which was assumed
by this test.
also depending on the version of libc, etc, "sem_post" may have a
different internal symbolic name. for example on my test setup it shows
up as "__new_sem_post". This seems to be reasonable, so i've relaxed the
name checking slightly.
Tested on hppa-linux. ok to apply?
randolph
2004-11-23 Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
testsuite/
* gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp: Override signal to check for hppa.
Slightly relex "sem_post" name checking.
Index: testsuite/gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 staticthreads.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp 1 Sep 2004 18:02:45 -0000 1.1
+++ testsuite/gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp 23 Nov 2004 22:42:11 -0000
@@ -62,10 +62,17 @@ gdb_test_multiple "continue" "$test" {
# See if handle SIG32 helps (a little) with a static multi-threaded
# program.
+set sig "SIG32"
+
+# SIGRTMIN is 37 on hppa-linux and hpux
+if [istarget hppa*-*-*] {
+ set sig "SIG37"
+}
+
rerun_to_main
-gdb_test "handle SIG32 nostop noprint pass"
-set test "Handle SIG32 helps"
-gdb_test "continue" " sem_post .*" "handle SIG32 helps"
+gdb_test "handle $sig nostop noprint pass"
+set test "Handle $sig helps"
+gdb_test "continue" " .*sem_post .*" "handle $sig helps"
# See if info threads produces anything approaching a thread list.
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/