Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:48:32 -0500
From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
We could use a Linux native specific observer, or handle this through
the target stack. I think handling it through the target stack makes
more sense, but I haven't sketched out what the target method would
look like. If other GDB developers think that the precedent of a
native-code-only observer isn't a bad one, then maybe we should go back
to your previous placement of the observer and give it a Linux specific
name. This will be aided by renaming thread-db to be clearly Linux
native code.
Ok. I'll wait and see if anybody else has objections. Eli, I understand that I
would have to rename the observer and change its definition appropriately.