This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: backtrace changes current source location
- From: Felix Lee <felix dot 1 at canids dot net>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:51:57 -0700
- Subject: Re: backtrace changes current source location
- References: <20041026075115.4A2C354AAB5@stray.canids> <20041026132924.GA26886@nevyn.them.org> <20041026150127.6ED3E54AAB5@stray.canids> <417FDC11.7060700@gnu.org>
Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>:
> (Don't forget to consider the error case - if an error is thrown a
> restore would be lost)
is it worth setting up an unwind handler for that? I couldn't
think of a case where an error would be usual, and for unusual
errors, all bets are off.
> Thanks for remembering this. However, as a separate test, it should be
> in a separate file.
how about putting the test in list.exp? or is the idea to move
toward one test per file?
--