This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfa/gdb.threads] Test static thread program

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:56:39 +0000
Subject: Re: [rfa/gdb.threads] Test static thread program
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <4118D96F.3080106@redhat.com> <411ABAD7.6020005@redhat.com> <411AC61E.1080700@gnu.org>

Andrew Cagney wrote:

I really really appreciate the contribution of a static thread test.
I'd like to know what specific failure mode(s) you're looking for.
GDB's thread debugging does not work on GNU/Linux when the program is linked statically.

Well yes, I guessed that much. Can you be more specific?

Any chance you could test it on Solaris?

Nope.


That worries me, since it sounds like you've only tested on linux.
Solaris has static/dynamic linking and thread debugging too.
Are there no solaris machines available to you?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfa/gdb.threads] Test static thread program
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- [rfa/gdb.threads] Test static thread program
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfa/gdb.threads] Test static thread program
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [rfa/gdb.threads] Test static thread program
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]