This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: [commited] DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries

From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:42:23 -0400
Subject: Re: Patch: [commited] DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
References: <40983940.3050003@redhat.com> <20040505040344.GA28793@nevyn.them.org> <vt23c6f2zbf.fsf@zenia.home> <409C1C42.2010908@redhat.com> <20040512013456.GA12569@nevyn.them.org> <vt2k6zhpakf.fsf@zenia.home> <40A3B128.5040309@redhat.com> <20040513173705.GA30414@nevyn.them.org>

Sure. I've now checked the patch into the 6.1 branch as well.

Regards

Bryce

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

I think this patch should be checked in on gdb_6_1-branch also. Bryce, would you mind taking care of that?

References:
- Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: Patch: [commited] DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Patch: [commited] DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]