This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] update "info scope" with new symtypes
Anyway, this discussion occurred in 2000 -- I've reviewed it,
and it was entirely concerned with the difficulty of *reviewing*
patches that included mixed code and whitespace changes.
Right, and _every_ patch, gets reviewed. It's just that some get
self-reviewed rather than peer-reviwed. Either way, the contributor is
expected to meet the same standards.
What we definitly do not do is apply lower standards to self-reviewed
patches.
Andrew