This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] update "info scope" with new symtypes



Anyway, this discussion occurred in 2000 -- I've reviewed it,
and it was entirely concerned with the difficulty of *reviewing*
patches that included mixed code and whitespace changes.

Right, and _every_ patch, gets reviewed. It's just that some get self-reviewed rather than peer-reviwed. Either way, the contributor is expected to meet the same standards.


What we definitly do not do is apply lower standards to self-reviewed patches.

Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]