This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Print in-memory struct return values

From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 17:12:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Print in-memory struct return values
References: <200405071707.i47H7kG5071172@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <409C0F30.4090409@gnu.org> <200405081958.i48JwlUU000353@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <409D4216.4050401@gnu.org> <200405082101.i48L1NUK000503@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>

Ouch.  That's really ugly.  I thought RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION
was already long enough.  I'd really like to avoid thos really long
names.  Hmm what if I use:

RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS
RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS

yes.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Print in-memory struct return values
  - From: Mark Kettenis

References:
- [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Print in-memory struct return values
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Print in-memory struct return values
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Print in-memory struct return values
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Print in-memory struct return values
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Print in-memory struct return values
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]