This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Remove KFAILs related to PR gdb/1623


The problem is fixed now, so these tests should PASS now.

Committed,

Mark

Index: testsuite/ChangeLog
from  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>

	* gdb.base/call-sc.exp: Remove patterns to KFAIL PR gdb/1623 on
	i*86-*-*.

Index: testsuite/gdb.base/call-sc.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/call-sc.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 call-sc.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.base/call-sc.exp 28 Apr 2004 00:15:52 -0000 1.2
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/call-sc.exp 28 Apr 2004 00:20:48 -0000
@@ -254,7 +254,6 @@ proc test_scalar_returns { } {
     set test "return foo; ${tests}"
     set return_value_unknown 0
     set return_value_unimplemented 0
-    setup_kfails call-sc-tld i*86-*-* gdb/1623
     gdb_test_multiple "return foo" "${test}" {
 	-re "The location" {
 	    # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
@@ -294,9 +293,6 @@ proc test_scalar_returns { } {
     setup_kfails call-sc-tll x86_64-*-* gdb/1624
     setup_kfails call-sc-tld x86_64-*-* gdb/1624
     setup_kfails call-sc-te x86_64-*-* gdb/1624
-    setup_kfails call-sc-tf i*86-*-* gdb/1623
-    setup_kfails call-sc-td i*86-*-* gdb/1623
-    setup_kfails call-sc-tld i*86-*-* gdb/1623
     gdb_test_multiple "p/c L" "${test}" {
 	-re " = 49 '1'.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
 	    if $return_value_unknown {


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]