This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Test scalar call/return/finish test - call-sc

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
Cc: cagney at gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,guitton dot at dot act-europe dot dot dot fr at elgar dot kettenis dot dyndns dot org
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 17:53:49 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] Test scalar call/return/finish test - call-sc
References: <4089AD34.90607@gnu.org> <20040424182018.GN2811@gnat.com> <200404251144.i3PBiaB6019886@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>

>    The following ones seem to be bona fide problems:
> 
> 	   FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: value foo returned; return call-sc-tc
> 	   FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: value foo returned; return call-sc-ts
> 	   ...
> 	   FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: p/c L; call call-sc-tf
> 
> I just checked in a patch that might fix these:

I just checked, and unfortunately the failures are still there :-/

> Anyway, can anybody shoot any holes in my new regexp?

I did try Daniel's suggestion, and it worked too.

-- 
Joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Test scalar call/return/finish test - call-sc
  - From: Mark Kettenis

References:
- [patch] Test scalar call/return/finish test - call-sc
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [patch] Test scalar call/return/finish test - call-sc
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [patch] Test scalar call/return/finish test - call-sc
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]