Re: [patch/rfc] "tui"

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>]

> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:53:26PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:40:10 -0500
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:32:13PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > > > 
> > > > This modifies the build machinery so that the program "tui" is built. 
> > > > "tui" starts up GDB's TUI (or Text User Interface).  Alternative program 
> > > > names include "tgdb", "gdbtui", ...
> > > > 
> > > > Comments?  Otherwize look to commit it round 16th Feb.
>
> > > 
> > > Any of those names sound great to me.  I think that one with "gdb" in it
> > > would be clearer; unlike Insight, the TUI does not have a separate life
> > > from GDB.
>
> > I too would prefer one of the names with "gdb" in it somewhere.
>
>
> I would also, I actually like the name gdbtui. It is clear that it is
> GDB, and it is clear that it is the text user interface.

Then:
	tui<tab>
or
	tg<tab>
wouldn't work.

Speaking of which, if that tcl/tk code ever integrated into GDB's code 
base (assuming it's first contributed), it to will need a name: tclgdb, 
tkgdb, and even gdbtk come to mind (ah, the ultimate irony).

Andrew