This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA]: Patch for ia64-tdep.c to cross-compile


> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:30:15 -0500
> From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
> > 
> > If this is an obvious patch, shouldn't we have some coding rule
> > somewhere to cover it?  It certainly isn't obvious out of the GDB
> > context, i.e. not a standard coding practice.
> 
> Eli,
> 
>    Do you want me to hold off on checking this in or do you just wish to discuss 
> whether such a patch should be marked as obvious in the future?

I don't think you need to hold off; sorry that I wasn't more clear.

What I wanted to discuss is whether we need to put some text somewhere
that includes the use of paddr* functions in the GDB coding standards.
Then it would be clear that fixing any deviation from that falls under
the obvious fix rule.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]