This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Avoid obstack_free in cp-namespace.c

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:25:32 -0500
Subject: Re: Avoid obstack_free in cp-namespace.c
References: <20040209211010.GA25073@nevyn.them.org> <yf2wu6wc5u7.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>

On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 01:15:28PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:10:10 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> 
> > What do you think of this change?  It makes the assumption that
> > lookup_block_symbol will not allocate anything on the objfile
> > obstack, which is no longer true in a patch I'm testing.  I really
> > dislike obstack_free for this exact reason.
> 
> Makes sense to me.

Checked in.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

References:
- Avoid obstack_free in cp-namespace.c
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Avoid obstack_free in cp-namespace.c
  - From: David Carlton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]