This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
- Cc: cagney at gnu dot org, drow at mvista dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:43:58 +0200
- Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
- References: <3FC119EB.1060102@gnu.org> <ufzgee29u.fsf@elta.co.il> <3FC234C0.1000500@gnu.org> <20031124165047.GA2227@nevyn.them.org> <1031124182547.ZM9776@localhost.localdomain> <3FC26407.9000704@gnu.org> <1031125000932.ZM11256@localhost.localdomain> <3FC60A75.8090803@gnu.org> <1031204044404.ZM3660@localhost.localdomain>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:44:04 -0700
> From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
>
> I have already stated that I think the renaming of deprecated
> interfaces is okay in some instances. I am concerned, however, that
> this approach is being used in instances where it doesn't really
> need to be.
Seconded.
Can we conclude this thread by agreeing that renaming of deprecated
interfaces should be discussed first in cases such as STREQ? I think
everybody agreed on that at some point.