This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: ia64 patch required after recent osabi changes

From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
To: cagney at gnu dot org
Cc: jjohnstn at redhat dot com, kevinb at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, marcel at xcllnt dot net
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 22:43:11 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: RFA: ia64 patch required after recent osabi changes
References: <3FA83E8D.8070709@redhat.com> <1031105022032.ZM25505@localhost.localdomain> <3FA95EDE.4000502@redhat.com> <3FA9619F.8030803@gnu.org>

   Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:46:23 -0500
   From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>

   > Patch checked in.  This fixes the regression with the new osabi
   > code and ia64 signal handling backtrace without having to remove
   > the assertion.

   Nice.  So everyone's clear, the assertion is correct and needed.
   The function is forcing an architecture switch so if the switch fails 
   (what the assertion was checking) GDB's a bit stuffed.

Great!  Thanks folks, for resolving this issue.

Mark

References:
- RFA: ia64 patch required after recent osabi changes
  - From: J. Johnston
- Re: RFA: ia64 patch required after recent osabi changes
  - From: Kevin Buettner
- Re: RFA: ia64 patch required after recent osabi changes
  - From: J. Johnston
- Re: RFA: ia64 patch required after recent osabi changes
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]