This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers

From: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
Cc: carlton at kealia dot com, ac131313 at redhat dot com,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 23 Oct 2003 16:20:03 -0500
Subject: Re: RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers
References: <vt2n0buw7r5.fsf@zenia.home> <3F96D128.5040904@redhat.com><vt23cdlvy21 dot fsf at zenia dot home> <3F970598 dot 9020908 atredhat dot com> <vt2k76wvp68 dot fsf at zenia dot home><yf28yncg8dx.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com><200310231538.h9NFch0a000511@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>

Since the only concerns raised about this change are stylistic, and
the general sense seems to be that it's preferable as is, I've
committed this change.  If people are very concerned about whether
can_run_code_for is a separate function or not, we can always discuss
that as a separate patch.

References:
- RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers
  - From: David Carlton
- Re: RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]