This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
Cc: Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>, jimb at redhat dot com,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:46:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
References: <20030910015400.GS423@gnat.com> <vt24qzkr1p1.fsf@zenia.home> <20030911180920.GD945@gnat.com> <16224.49692.542476.869174@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20030911192958.GE945@gnat.com> <3F612249.7060102@redhat.com>

> BTW, this setting of the global current_language all also worries me :-) 
>  Should parse_expression take an explict language?

Me too, actually. I think passing the langauge to parse_expression et al
is a good idea. It's more work, but seems more manageable than using a
couple of global variables.

Jim, what do you think?

-- 
Joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Jim Blandy

References:
- [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]