This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[patch, rfa:doco, rfa:ppc] Generic red zone arch method
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 15:07:28 -0400
- Subject: [patch, rfa:doco, rfa:ppc] Generic red zone arch method
Hello,
Ref: Skip the "red zone" on AMD64
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-08/msg00092.html
The attached implements the suggested fix in that thread. For x86-64,
it gives the same results as the original change (need more test cases).
Eli, doco ok?
Kevin, for PPC64 and AIX I pulled the numbers from ABI doco. It isn't
yet tested. For PPC64 I've too many other failures for results to be
meaningful, and for AIX probably won't happen :-(.
The remaining bits (framework and x86-64) I'll commit in a few days.
Andrew
Index: ChangeLog
2003-08-16 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* gdbarch.sh (FRAME_RED_ZONE_SIZE): New architecture method.
* gdbarch.h, gdbarch.c: Re-generate.
* infcall.c (call_function_by_hand): Adjust the SP by
frame_red_zone_size before allocating any stack space.
* rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Set "frame_red_zone_size".
* x86-64-tdep.c (x86_64_frame_align): New function.
(x86_64_init_abi): Set "frame_red_zone_size" and "frame_align".
* x86-64-tdep.c (x86_64_push_arguments): Revert 2003-08-07 change.
Remove code adjusting SP so that it skips over the Red Zone.
Index: doc/ChangeLog
2003-08-13 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* gdbint.texinfo (Target Architecture Definition): Document
"frame_red_zone_size".
Index: gdbarch.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbarch.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.261
diff -u -r1.261 gdbarch.sh
--- gdbarch.sh 4 Aug 2003 22:24:44 -0000 1.261
+++ gdbarch.sh 16 Aug 2003 18:51:07 -0000
@@ -643,6 +643,7 @@
F:2:STACK_ALIGN:CORE_ADDR:stack_align:CORE_ADDR sp:sp
M:::CORE_ADDR:frame_align:CORE_ADDR address:address
F:2:REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR:int:reg_struct_has_addr:int gcc_p, struct type *type:gcc_p, type
+v::FRAME_RED_ZONE_SIZE:int:frame_red_zone_size
v:2:PARM_BOUNDARY:int:parm_boundary
#
v:2:TARGET_FLOAT_FORMAT:const struct floatformat *:float_format::::::default_float_format (gdbarch)::%s:(TARGET_FLOAT_FORMAT)->name
Index: infcall.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infcall.c,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.22 infcall.c
--- infcall.c 10 Aug 2003 17:19:23 -0000 1.22
+++ infcall.c 16 Aug 2003 18:51:08 -0000
@@ -440,6 +440,18 @@
CORE_ADDR old_sp = read_sp ();
if (gdbarch_frame_align_p (current_gdbarch))
{
+ sp = gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, old_sp);
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-08-13: Skip the "red zone". For some
+ ABIs, a function can use memory beyond the inner most stack
+ address. AMD64 called that region the "red zone". Skip at
+ least the "red zone" size before allocating any space on
+ the stack. */
+ if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
+ sp -= gdbarch_frame_red_zone_size (current_gdbarch);
+ else
+ sp += gdbarch_frame_red_zone_size (current_gdbarch);
+ /* Still aligned? */
+ gdb_assert (sp == gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, sp));
/* NOTE: cagney/2002-09-18:
On a RISC architecture, a void parameterless generic dummy
@@ -460,7 +472,6 @@
stack. That way, two dummy frames can never be identical.
It does burn a few bytes of stack but that is a small price
to pay :-). */
- sp = gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, old_sp);
if (sp == old_sp)
{
if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
@@ -476,12 +487,16 @@
else
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-09-18: Hey, you loose!
- Who knows how badly aligned the SP is! Further, per comment
- above, if the generic dummy frame ends up empty (because
- nothing is pushed) GDB won't be able to correctly perform
- back traces. If a target is having trouble with backtraces,
- first thing to do is add FRAME_ALIGN() to the architecture
- vector. If that fails, try unwind_dummy_id(). */
+ Who knows how badly aligned the SP is!
+
+ If the generic dummy frame ends up empty (because nothing is
+ pushed) GDB won't be able to correctly perform back traces.
+ If a target is having trouble with backtraces, first thing to
+ do is add FRAME_ALIGN() to the architecture vector. If that
+ fails, try unwind_dummy_id().
+
+ If the ABI specifies a "Red Zone" (see the doco) the code
+ below will quietly trash it. */
sp = old_sp;
}
Index: rs6000-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.147
diff -u -r1.147 rs6000-tdep.c
--- rs6000-tdep.c 26 Jun 2003 17:18:42 -0000 1.147
+++ rs6000-tdep.c 16 Aug 2003 18:51:08 -0000
@@ -2944,6 +2944,12 @@
set_gdbarch_deprecated_fix_call_dummy (gdbarch, rs6000_fix_call_dummy);
set_gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, rs6000_frame_align);
+ if (sysv_abi && wordsize == 8)
+ /* PPC64 SYSV. */
+ set_gdbarch_frame_red_zone_size (gdbarch, 288);
+ else if (!sysv_abi && wordsize == 4)
+ /* PowerOpen / AIX 32 bit. */
+ set_gdbarch_frame_red_zone_size (gdbarch, 220);
set_gdbarch_deprecated_save_dummy_frame_tos (gdbarch, generic_save_dummy_frame_tos);
set_gdbarch_deprecated_push_return_address (gdbarch, ppc_push_return_address);
set_gdbarch_believe_pcc_promotion (gdbarch, 1);
Index: x86-64-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.87
diff -u -r1.87 x86-64-tdep.c
--- x86-64-tdep.c 7 Aug 2003 11:26:42 -0000 1.87
+++ x86-64-tdep.c 16 Aug 2003 18:51:09 -0000
@@ -614,13 +614,6 @@
int *stack_values;
stack_values = alloca (nargs * sizeof (int));
- /* Before storing anything to the stack we must skip
- the "Red zone" (see the "Function calling sequence" section
- of AMD64 ABI).
- It could have already been skipped in the function's
- prologue, but we don't care and will easily skip it once again. */
- sp -= 128;
-
for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
{
enum x86_64_reg_class class[MAX_CLASSES];
@@ -1203,6 +1196,14 @@
return frame_id_build (fp + 16, frame_pc_unwind (next_frame));
}
+/* 16 byte align the SP per frame requirements. */
+
+static CORE_ADDR
+x86_64_frame_align (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR sp)
+{
+ return sp & -(CORE_ADDR)16;
+}
+
void
x86_64_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
{
@@ -1246,6 +1247,8 @@
/* Call dummy code. */
set_gdbarch_push_dummy_call (gdbarch, x86_64_push_dummy_call);
+ set_gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, x86_64_frame_align);
+ set_gdbarch_frame_red_zone_size (gdbarch, 128);
set_gdbarch_convert_register_p (gdbarch, x86_64_convert_register_p);
set_gdbarch_register_to_value (gdbarch, i387_register_to_value);
Index: doc/gdbint.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.158
diff -u -r1.158 gdbint.texinfo
--- doc/gdbint.texinfo 4 Aug 2003 20:43:57 -0000 1.158
+++ doc/gdbint.texinfo 16 Aug 2003 18:51:14 -0000
@@ -3229,6 +3229,24 @@
By default, no frame based stack alignment is performed.
+@item int frame_red_zone_size
+
+The number of bytes, beyond the innermost-stack-address, reserved by the
+@sc{abi}. A function is permitted to use this scratch area (instead of
+allocating extra stack space).
+
+When performing an inferior function call, to ensure that it does not
+modify this area, @value{GDBN} adjusts the innermost-stack-address by
+@var{frame_red_zone_size} bytes before pushing parameters onto the
+stack.
+
+By default, zero bytes are allocated. The value must be aligned
+(@pxref{frame_align}).
+
+The @sc{amd64} (nee x86-64) @sc{abi} documentation refers to the
+@emph{red zone} when describing this scratch area.
+@kindex red zone
+
@item DEPRECATED_FRAME_CHAIN(@var{frame})
@findex DEPRECATED_FRAME_CHAIN
Given @var{frame}, return a pointer to the calling frame.