Daniel> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:29:42AM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
>> ...
Daniel> Refresher on this one: the patch adds a "disconnect" commad,
Daniel> and implements it for remote targets. "disconnect" leaves
Daniel> the target stopped, while "detach" usually resumes it.
Daniel> Useful with kgdb, gdbserver, et cetera.
>> Useful indeed. But there is nothing in the names "detach" and
>> "disconnect" that suggests how they differ. Would it be possible
>> to have command names that are suggestive of their action?
Daniel> The last time I proposed this, we went back and forth for a
Daniel> week on names and this was the best we could come up with.
Daniel> Have you got a better suggestion?
Nothing really promising. But how about doing this with an (optional)
argument on the "detach" command, e.g., "detach stop" and "detach go"
with the latter being the default?