This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: "disconnect" command


>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:

 Daniel> This patch got tabled shortly before 5.3, due to bad timing
 Daniel> on my part. Now here we are coming up on 6.0 and my timing's
 Daniel> no better... this is the first of several old patches that I
 Daniel> would like to see included in 6.0, assuming I get the time to
 Daniel> revisit them all.

 Daniel> Refresher on this one: the patch adds a "disconnect" commad,
 Daniel> and implements it for remote targets.  "disconnect" leaves
 Daniel> the target stopped, while "detach" usually resumes it.
 Daniel> Useful with kgdb, gdbserver, et cetera.

Useful indeed.  But there is nothing in the names "detach" and
"disconnect" that suggests how they differ.  Would it be possible to
have command names that are suggestive of their action?

     paul


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]