This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [commit] remove DEPRECATED_SYMBOL_NAME uses from symtab.c
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: David Carlton <carlton at kealia dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,ezannoni at redhat dot com, jimb at redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:01:40 -0400
- Subject: Re: [commit] remove DEPRECATED_SYMBOL_NAME uses from symtab.c
- References: <m3isrbffz9.fsf@dhcp-10-42-69-238.kealia.com> <3EE8B108.7020306@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:57:44PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Does this:
>
> > #define COMPLETION_LIST_ADD_SYMBOL(symbol, sym_text, len, text, word) \
> >- do { \
> >- if (SYMBOL_DEMANGLED_NAME (symbol) != NULL) \
> >- /* Put only the mangled name on the list. */ \
> >- /* Advantage: "b foo<TAB>" completes to "b foo(int, int)" */ \
> >- /* Disadvantage: "b foo__i<TAB>" doesn't complete. */ \
> > completion_list_add_name \
> >- (SYMBOL_DEMANGLED_NAME (symbol), (sym_text), (len), (text), (word));
> >\
> >- else \
> >- completion_list_add_name \
> >- (DEPRECATED_SYMBOL_NAME (symbol), (sym_text), (len), (text),
> >(word)); \
> >- } while (0)
> >+ (SYMBOL_NATURAL_NAME (symbol), (sym_text), (len), (text), (word))
>
> mean that COMPLETION_LIST_ADD_SYMBOL is also dead? (I have trouble
> reading unified diffs :-)
I guess so - it's still there, but it looks to me like it's a
transparent function call now.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer