This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc] Annotation level THREE
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>, bob_rossi at cox dot net,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, nick at nick dot uklinux dot net
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:56:01 -0500
- Subject: Re: [rfc] Annotation level THREE
- References: <200303120609.h2C69h904491@duracef.shout.net> <3E6F491A.4050401@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:50:02AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Hi Andrew,
> >
> >
> >>With this and its doco in, I think 5.4 is clear to go (or at least try
> >>to).
> >
> >
> >The last time I looked in detail was 2003-02-16:
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-02/msg00257.html
> >
> >At that time, there were still several high priority PR's about build
> >issues; x86-64 regresions; and java fails the 'break main' test.
> >
> >Do you care about any of these things?
>
> `or at least try to'. As far as I know this is the only feature that
> could block the next release. It's critical that a GDB release
> containing this be made soon.
>
> - x86-64 was always broken
Eh, I believe that x86-64 worked in GDB 5.3, judging from Michal's
comments.
> - java improvements would be nice
>
> A real concern is that `long long' regression.
It's down the road behind my currently pending DWARF-2 patch.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer