This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC/RFA] New 'to' command

On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:09:51PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Fernando Nasser writes:
>  > Sorry to get back to the name thing. But I believe the discussion concentrated 
>  > more on the semantics of the two commands and how until would be implemented -- 
>  > nobody was specifically fond of the names that came up in any case.
>  > 
>  > What about "advance-to"?  You can add "to" as an alias, I don't mind (although I 
>  > don't thing we need/should as typing "adv" will suffice)..
>  > 
>  > I believe it captures the idea of what the user is trying to do in this case.
> 
> I like it. 
> going once, going twice, sold ?

Until stays in this stack frame, advance-to goes to anything as long as
the frame doesn't exit?  Sold to me.  Thanks for the name, Fernando!


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]