This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Added verbosity to dwarf2*
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: mludvig at suse dot cz
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:36:49 +0300
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Added verbosity to dwarf2*
- References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021215080339.22353E-100000@is> <3DFD9516.7060705@suse.cz>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:55:50 +0100
> From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to say "[in module %s]"? I'm afraid a BFD file
> > name alone won't explain enough to the user. After all, not everyone who
> > uses GDB knows all the module names in their program by heart.
>
> Well, why not. Anyway if an error or warning like this happens, it's
> usually a GCC or GDB problem, not a user-level mistake. But it's more
> descriptive, I agree.
>
> So can I commit it in this form?
Fine with me, but I don't think I can approve patches to the DWARF2
reader.