This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: sim/mips patch: add support for more NEC VR targets



Not really.  8-)

First of all i'm not sure which question you were trying to answer,
even (today's, i.e. "veto, anyone?" or a previous question).

Is your intent here to say that really, "the mips sim will/must be
done the way you outline above," or is it to provide a rationale for
why you think it should be done that way.  (to my mind, it could be
either; you're a mips sim maintainer long before i got here.)
This is the way it has (ment to) been done for all MIPS ISA variants since igen replaced gencode. You've proposed a change to that process so I'm [trying to] explain the rationale behind the current status-quo :-)

Andrew

Based on what you've said above, I still don't agree that your
suggested way of doing this is the right one.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]