Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:54:01PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > This patch is pretty obvious. I couldn't figure out why my machine was
> > running out of memory; forking GDB to run an 'ls' during the maint.exp tests
> > can be a bit heavy, since it may have all of glibc's debug info loaded.
> > This patch seems logical to me... OK to commit?
>
> Not as is. There's some auto-confery involved, since many systems
> (some systems?) don't have vfork. Grep for vfork in fork-child.c.
Not as much as there used to be. But you're right, I goofed. OK with
the addition of '#include "gdb_vfork.h"', which is all fork-child.c
uses now?
For all I know, that's OK -- but I don't know.
I'll step back now, and wait for someone who does.
Yep, from the ARI: