This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Outstanding?

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 21:11:42 -0400
Subject: Re: Outstanding?
References: <3D93CD83.5020704@redhat.com> <3D9A1FEE.A8BE31F7@redhat.com> <3D9A2DC7.5000706@redhat.com> <20021002003826.GA24558@nevyn.them.org>

On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 07:20:39PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:

Just FYI, I got my outstanding down to zero.
Everything is now a bug report.  See:
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/


Really?  Where are they all?

Many of the threads were not for patches. Rather for issues, questions and other problems. None of those lead to a bug report.

You filed fifty or so PRs, I think.  Looks like 725 through 769.  Your
outstanding list was oodles longer even ignoring duplicates.  For
instance, choosing one at random, the controversial breakpoint at the
beginning of the prologue patch; there's no bug report for that.

My understanding of that patch was ``no CLI change''. See MichaelS's comment. Someone can change the MI if they so feel.

Just don't want you to think they're all accounted for and start losing
them...

?

Andrew

References:
- Re: Outstanding?
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Outstanding?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: Outstanding?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]