This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:11:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc
References: <ro1ofasvf2p.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <20020920155144.GA10888@nevyn.them.org>

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:46:54AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:

Andrew just pointed out to me that the presence of both m-static.cc
and m-static1.cc (in gdb.c++) violates the 8.3 rule.  Is it okay if I
rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc?  (And make the corresponding
obvious change to m-static.exp, of course.)  Or is there some other
name I should use?


I'd rather you just add them to the list; it's in
gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst.  Others may have a different opinion,
though..

Yes.  Per:
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdbint_13.html#SEC122
This isn't a file needed to build GDB so fnchange.lst is ok.

Andrew

References:
- [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc
  - From: David Carlton
- Re: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]