This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] procfs.c: TARGET_CAN_USE_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINT via target vector


Kevin Buettner wrote:
> 
> On Aug 13,  5:11pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > > +#ifndef TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
> >
> > I just think the macro should be `largely' renamed:
> > ``PROCFS_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS''.
> >
> > Largely?  There are a few exceptions -- i386v-nat.c and mips/tm-embed.h
> > which could be left alone.
> 
> For the procfs related uses, I suspect that we can eliminate the use
> of the macro altogether.  (I'd prefer to get Michael's opinion though
> before attempting such a change.)

I don't see how you can eliminate the macro.
How will you distinguish which procfs targets can support HW
watchpoints?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]