This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] breakpoints and function prologues...
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jim Ingham <jingham at apple dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:33:37 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFC] breakpoints and function prologues...
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- References: <157B023C-B09E-11D6-BDB5-00039379E320@apple.com> <3D5C4FCB.4070005@ges.redhat.com>
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >
> > Most users I have talked to think that setting a break on the "{" at the beginning of a function means the same thing as setting a breakpoint on the function. But that is not the case. "break funcName" is AFTER the prologue, "break file:<line containing "{"> is the true function beginning.
>
> Don't forget that ``break func'' is is going to change. It's going to
> go back to the start of the function!
???
Since when?