Re: [RFA] Mips, return_value_location, small structs

[Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>]

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > I know o32 needs work too, but the two can be treated separately.
> >> > I do guarantee that this patch does not make o32 any worse.
> >> > In fact, I have been testing to make sure that none of my patches
> >> > have made o32 any worse.
> >> >
> >> > Can I check this one in for n32, if I promise to work on o32 next?
> >
> >>
> >> Why not just fix this bug for all three ABIs?  o32 is just like n32/n64
> >> in that it cross-eyes the arguments.
> >
> >
> > Andrew, o32 works as it is.  I can't find anything related to this
> > patch that still needs to be done for o32.  Unles you can suggest
> > something specific, may I check this patch in?
> 
> FYI, this patch should now be redundant.  I rewrote the n32/n64
> extract/store return value code.

Check, this patch is no longer pertainant.
Withdrawn.