This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Which autoheader?
"Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com> writes:
Andrew> Which version of autoheader did you use when re-generating
Andrew> config.in? I'm finding that, using 000227, I can't reproduce
Andrew> config.in.
fleche. autoheader --version
Autoconf version 2.13
This is the autoconf in Red Hat Linux 7.3.
One hopes it hasn't been modified from the net release very heavily.
What is 000227?
Both GDB and BINUTILS are regenerated using auto ``000227'' which can be
found in:
ftp://sources.redhat.com/~ftp/pub/binutils/
there are also automake, gettext and libtool. How applicable the latter
ones are to GDB I don't know.
(this confusion is normal :-)
I've never heard of an autoconf release named that way.
What does your autoheader generate for config.in?
Re-generating both configure.in and configure had the attached effect.
Looking more closely, I see I checked in a config.in that includes
PACKAGE -- but the configure.in patch hasn't yet been accepted for
gdb. This definition is bogus but harmless. Is that what you're
seeing? If so I can revert that patch easily.
No the <sys/stat.h> et.al. checks.
I'll re-generate both and check the result in.
enjoy,
Andrew