This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] Switch to generic_func_frame_chain_valid()
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 13:18:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Switch to generic_func_frame_chain_valid()
- References: <3CF948A6.5020500@cygnus.com>
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 06:20:22PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This finishes off (I think) the FRAME_CHAIN_VALID debate. It sets it to
> generic_func_frame_chain_valid(). That function being tweaked to handle
> both generic dummy frame and the old style frame cases.
>
> I'll commit it in a few days.
>
> Andrew
After this goes in, can we start switching existing targets? That
seemed to be the real point of debate - file_frame_chain_valid versus
func_frame_chain_valid. With the addition of a 'set' variable for
people who prefer the file_frame_chain_valid behavior, I don't see any
reason not to.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer