This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] z8k fixes
- From: Christian Groessler <chris at groessler dot org>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: Jim blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 21 May 2002 12:56:14 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] z8k fixes
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > this patch fixes some small problems with the z8k simulator. I don't
> > have copyright assignments for gdb, but I hope the patch is small
> > enough to get integrated without.
> >
>
> > sim/z8k/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2002-05-07 Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org>
> >
> > * list.c: Regenerated with current opcodes/z8k-opc.h.
>
> How do I do this? I was thinking that the patch was too big but, if the
> bulk is generated then yes, it is ok.
It is generated. Edit sim/z8k/writecode.c and set the DIRTY_HACK
define to 1. I think it's not really needed anymore, but the old
list.c was generated with the same define.
Then compile writecode.c (it will also be compiled if you build gdb
for z8k-coff) and do a "./writecode -m > list.c".
> Would it be possible for you to get an assignment? (if there is a
> possability then contact jimb (CC'd).
Depending on the gdb changes needed (see below), I'll do.
> The z8k is due for an overaul (or it may be deleted).
What should be changed/fixed there?
regards,
chris