This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros


> Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
> 
> |> Further, it's general to talk about 'ISO' when referring to c99.  I said 
> |> 'ANSI', which is usually taken to refer to the original standard.
> 
> I'm pretty sure that ANSI has adopted C99 too.  And C89 (well, C90
> actually) was an ISO standard as well.

GDB requires ISO C, not ANSI C :-)
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_13.html#SEC102

(Yes I need to fix the ``ISO-C'' typo, clarify which ISO C standard (in 
case there are two), and yes ISO simply adopted the ANSI standard :-)

Any way, the MINIX compiler doesn't accept C++ style comments so I don't 
think it can be used....  Hmmm, should see if GDB compiles on that 
platform :-^

> |> And anyway, the important point here is that GDB is not being coded to c99.
> 
> No sweat.

I think the important thing is to pressure GCC and BINUTILS to drop the 
K&R C requirement :-)

enjoy,
Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]