This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/rfc] Revised multi-arch process
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:51:57 -0500
- Subject: Re: [rfa/rfc] Revised multi-arch process
Andrew Cagney writes:
+Since each patch is well defined, and since each change has been tested
+and shows no regressions, the patches are considered @emph{fairly}
+obvious. Such patches do not need approval. Occasional steps in the
+process may be more complicated and less clear. The developer is
+expected to use their judgment and is encouraged to seek advice as
+needed.
Can you add some context that these patches do not need additional
approval for people who are already listed in the MAINTAINERS file.
That is, if Joe Contributor sends us a patch by e-mail, we aren't
automatically going to apply it.
Other than that, this is nice, it makes me want to go multi-arch
something. :)
Michael C