This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA/RFC] MI: accept (void) as well as ().


> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> 
> 
>> > This changes a couple of patterns that accept function pointer types.
>> > It allows them to accept (void) in addition to ().
>> >
>> > 2002-05-08  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@redhat.com>
>> >
>> >       * mi-var-child.exp: Accept (void) as well as ().
>> >
> 
>> 
>> Just to double check.  This () vs (void) is from STABS vs DWARF2?
> 
> 
> I dunno -- I just know it is appearing in my latest-gcc embedded target, 
> and doesn't appear in my older native-linux gcc.
> 
> Is it imporatant?  Neither is really incorrect...

It shouldn't be.  Just want to be sure that the difference isn't 
something MI can control.  Anyone know?

enjoy,
Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]